Skip to main content
I remember when a bond for a first time DWI was $500. Now, in Tarrant County a person accused of a first time DWI, with no other criminal history, stays in jail for up to 3 days as the system "processes" their income level to set an appropriate bond (where many will do a government pretrial bond) . People are being shipped from small municipalities to the central Tarrant County jail before this is done.  The law allows magistrates up to 72 hours to set a bond and unfortunately, this is about how long it is taking.  Moreover, once a person bonds out many are required to report to pretrial services. Here, they are paying fees and taking drug tests before they are even convicted. I have a current Parker County client who has not had a DWI in 21 years and the magistrate ordered that he have a $500 a month SCRAM bracelet (measures your sweat for alcohol),plus an interlock on any vehicle he drives. He must also report to pretrial services in Parker County once a week. His case is not even filed!  He works out in west Texas! (We are in the process of changing this.) It is outrageous overkill  that a magistrate would make such an order. If he is found Not Guilty or his case is never filed, he does not get one penny back. This did not exist on such a vast scale when I first started practicing law. No wonder all the bail bondsmen are going out of business. The government has taken over and they can't even wait for a conviction. Wrong.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can A DWI Affect My Eligibility For Global Entry?

In general, all United States citizens and lawful permanent residents possess eligibility to apply for Global Entry. This is a program through Customs and Border Protection that allows for expedited clearance for pre-approved, low-risk travelers. That said, Customs my deny eligibility for a variety of reasons such as providing false information on the application and a finding of customs violation for *any* country (not just US Customs violations). However, there are 3 important reasons related to criminal defense that everyone should know. First, Customs may deny eligibility if you have been denied for the purchase of a firearm. This restriction is important because firearm restrictions may, on occasion, be a condition of a criminal charge, even if the charge is dismissed. Further, a denial of a firearm purchase may show Customs that you are not a “low-risk” traveler based on the reason for denial. Second, Customs may deny eligibility if you are the subject of an *ongoing investiga...
Post a Comment
Read more

Lying Witnesses: The Shabby State of Criminal Justice in our Country

The American Criminal Justice System: “Houston, We have a Problem.” James Ferguson Mark Fuhrman, convicted of a felony perjury after the O.J. Simpson trial, is now a national Fox legal analyst, an “expert witness” on police matters. Last week, the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati, Ohio, ruled “Dr.” James Ferguson, a state toxicologist, convicted of perjury, could NOT be sued or found liable for lying in a murder case where his expert witness testimony was relied upon by the judge for the conviction. Fred Zain, toxicologist at the West Virginia Department of Public Safety, falsified lab results which resulted in as many as 134 wrongful convictions. Once under investigation, he merely picked up and moved to San Antonio, Texas to work as a toxicologist where an investigation found at least 180 cases in which fraud may have led to wrongful convictions. He died in the comforts of his Florida home in 2002. Picking up the pieces in Boston, Massachusetts, over 34,000 lab...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Biggest Misconception in a DWI

The biggest misconception in a DWI is to correlate a single bad driving behavior with guilt in a DWI. Whether it be a jerk (failure to maintain a single lane), accident (losing control and hitting something like a curb, pole, or another car), or stopping too long at a stop light, this may very well be evidence of driver inattention unrelated to intoxication. I have analyzed thousands of DWI cases and have tried over 300. What I typically find is a prosecutor who argues that the driving behavior which so often happens due to driver inattention be argued as clear evidence that a person is intoxicated. This is simply not fact. The facts are that every day drivers commit these violations due to distraction, inattention, fatigue or a host of other factors. Accidents are so common that the law mandates a driver operate a motor vehicle on our public roads with liability insurance. The mere fact that a driver commits these with alcohol or a substance (medication, drugs, caffeine, etc.) in ...
Post a Comment
Read more