Skip to main content

True Story of Texas Blood Testing: A Racket

First, let me start off with a very important fact that many may not know: for every single DWI conviction in the state of Texas, Texas DPS sends a separate bill (outside of all the fees and punishment in court) called a DWI surcharge that ranges from $3,000 to $6,000 (depends on the type of DWI) to the convicted citizen. They have even tried to do it to people who possess out of state licenses although they don't qualify for the surcharge. Anyone who thinks Texas DPS does not have a financial interest in DWI convictions is sorely mistaken.

My story is just one of many across the state and it is shameful to share. This week I went to court to discuss a ".09" blood test, first time DWI with a prosecutor in Dallas. I explained that my client and I had the blood retested with a better qualified lab, one which is well respected in  private industry and whom the federal government uses (Department of Health and Human Services). The result came back .07. Once you consider a  margin of uncertainty of .02, my client's blood ranges from .05 to .11 depending on which sample you rely on. The assistant district attorney told me she would not consider the retest as this lab was not "Texas DPS certified" (which is the law).  Most forensic labs in Texas get their state mandated Texas DPS certification by paying the fee and applying for ASCLD (American Society of of Crime Lab Directors) certification. ASCLD certification is fraught with problems. For example, a "blind audit" is not random at all. These huge deviances from proper standards has caused several states to disassociate with ASCLD, including the U.S. Army. Also on record is ASCLD's continued support of substandard forensic labs despite the reporting of serious lab errors it has failed to take proper corrective action on, some of which have resulted in litigation. The bottom line is that the proper standards of operating guidelines and procedures are necessary. This is seriously lacking in the Texas DPS- ASCLD certification process. To deprive a citizen accused of the right to have their blood independently tested is a ploy to insulate itself from scrutiny while rubber-stamping essentially substandard work if one factors in the ASCLD issues versus industry peer review.

The new "Michael Morton" discovery law forces da(s) to hand over all the evidence. A law had to be passed to make this happen. Enacted this past January, previous to this prosecutors willingly withheld evidence that could prove someone not guilty (Michael Morton spent 25 years in prison for a murder he did not commit).  There is no difference in withholding evidence and denying one the right to have evidence independently tested. It is a farce to create a subterfuge (requiring a "Texas DPS" certification) for the district attorney not to consider all the evidence. This law cannot withstand basic due process arguments in appellate court. Until then, it is necessary to repeal this  "Texas DPS certified" only law where no citizen of Texas can get blood testing outside a Texas DPS approved lab. Just a short time ago, Texas DPS was still using a"single point" ethanol control in test batches despite legal ramifications at both .08 and .15.

The only thing that Dallas prosecutor was interested in that morning was how to convict my client, not the truth. No one cares until the injustice happens to them or a loved one. It is time to make Texas fair for everyone. A false conviction is a travesty, not something politicians should be proud of or we the public allow. If the government labs were so good, why are they scared of having their work retested? Here is an article on problems with Texas DPS, representative of the lax standards in forensic labs that exist still today in way too many places:  Texas DPS Lab Problems

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can A DWI Affect My Eligibility For Global Entry?

In general, all United States citizens and lawful permanent residents possess eligibility to apply for Global Entry. This is a program through Customs and Border Protection that allows for expedited clearance for pre-approved, low-risk travelers. That said, Customs my deny eligibility for a variety of reasons such as providing false information on the application and a finding of customs violation for *any* country (not just US Customs violations). However, there are 3 important reasons related to criminal defense that everyone should know. First, Customs may deny eligibility if you have been denied for the purchase of a firearm. This restriction is important because firearm restrictions may, on occasion, be a condition of a criminal charge, even if the charge is dismissed. Further, a denial of a firearm purchase may show Customs that you are not a “low-risk” traveler based on the reason for denial. Second, Customs may deny eligibility if you are the subject of an *ongoing investiga...
Post a Comment
Read more

Lying Witnesses: The Shabby State of Criminal Justice in our Country

The American Criminal Justice System: “Houston, We have a Problem.” James Ferguson Mark Fuhrman, convicted of a felony perjury after the O.J. Simpson trial, is now a national Fox legal analyst, an “expert witness” on police matters. Last week, the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati, Ohio, ruled “Dr.” James Ferguson, a state toxicologist, convicted of perjury, could NOT be sued or found liable for lying in a murder case where his expert witness testimony was relied upon by the judge for the conviction. Fred Zain, toxicologist at the West Virginia Department of Public Safety, falsified lab results which resulted in as many as 134 wrongful convictions. Once under investigation, he merely picked up and moved to San Antonio, Texas to work as a toxicologist where an investigation found at least 180 cases in which fraud may have led to wrongful convictions. He died in the comforts of his Florida home in 2002. Picking up the pieces in Boston, Massachusetts, over 34,000 lab...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Biggest Misconception in a DWI

The biggest misconception in a DWI is to correlate a single bad driving behavior with guilt in a DWI. Whether it be a jerk (failure to maintain a single lane), accident (losing control and hitting something like a curb, pole, or another car), or stopping too long at a stop light, this may very well be evidence of driver inattention unrelated to intoxication. I have analyzed thousands of DWI cases and have tried over 300. What I typically find is a prosecutor who argues that the driving behavior which so often happens due to driver inattention be argued as clear evidence that a person is intoxicated. This is simply not fact. The facts are that every day drivers commit these violations due to distraction, inattention, fatigue or a host of other factors. Accidents are so common that the law mandates a driver operate a motor vehicle on our public roads with liability insurance. The mere fact that a driver commits these with alcohol or a substance (medication, drugs, caffeine, etc.) in ...
Post a Comment
Read more